09-07-2007
07:55 PM
1 Love
One question: if the incident embarrassed Kyla so much, why is she, and her mother and attorney, drawing more attention to the incident? Is Kyla, mother and attorney looking to try to cash in on this month's old incident? Hmmm. Makes one wonder.
As an employee of SWA, we believe in our culture that we are taught from day one - SWA is the LUV airline. Yes, back in the day, employees who were then known as "stewardesses" wore short-shorts and knee-high boots - that was the fad. But their bodies were covered.
Now, our "flight attendants" dress in casual attire - and are able to look professional while being comfortable.
I have to ask myself why the Today show hasn't aired a segment on SWA's support of our troops overseas, the LUV rations that are collected and sent to the troops fighting for our country. . .now that is a news story!
I am sure the SWA employee spoke quietly to Kyla in explaining the situation, just as we are taught when we have to speak to someone who is intoxicated and not able to fly on their chosen flight. The entire thing would have been over and forgotten had Kyla not wanted to bring attention to herself.
Only those who were traveling on the flight know for sure if Kyla had on all of her undergarments. I didn't see Matt Lauer ask Kyla to reach up. . .what a sight that would have been on the Today show!
Years ago, people put on their "Sunday best" for airline travel. Now, we are much more casual. But it is necessary to be "appropriately attired" in our casualness.
What famous Vulcan said, "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" ? 136 other flying customers should not have to have felt uncomfortable because of the scanty nature of Kyla's outfit.
... View more