11-17-2007
10:23 PM
1 Love
Oops - Gary...Gary...Gary
I have flown Southwest almost exclusively (98% of the time) in the last 8 years, logging more than 300 flights.
This one is probably going to cost you a lot of loyal passengers, although there really aren't a lot of other decent options in markets like Manchester. If you are going to change the old policy of first come first served, why not just assign seats?
Your system is too complicated and it clashes with Southwest's established "everyone is equal" culture. It also pits passengers against one another because a first boarder will be trying to block out the seats next to them waiting for their traveling partners (who aren't A-listers).
What happens to a child or companion (hey - a companion pass holder is one of your best customers) who can't board with the A-lister?
You didn't think this one through - the best course would be to admit a mistake and either go back to first come first served, or start giving out assigned seats.
The more you try to fix it, the more complex it will become and the more consternation it will create.
Switch to assigned seats or go back to first come first served! Gee - I still like the plastic boarding cards - because hacks on a computer couldn't get ahead of me.
Finally, if you are going to charge extra to board first, let me select my seat! I should at least know what I am buying before I pay you. Check out the Northwest web site - they still don't have it figured out right since you can't assign all the seats at the same time on a multiple leg flight, but at least you know what you are paying for, when you upgrade to an aisle seat 24 hours before the flight.
This is a dramatic culture change, and the many will end up abandoning the airline while the few, with large expense accounts, probably won't make up for the lost revenue.
Even working on the financial numbers, this one doesn't make sense. You didn't properly calculate the revenue that you will loose from loyal passengers looking elsewhere.
... View more